Part Three: The Pelagian Crisis (411–430)
Edited By Frederick Van Fleteren
Article 258: Heros and Lazarus
Heros and Lazarus2
According to Zosimus, Heros entered and resigned the episcopacy in a manner similar to Lazarus.3 However in his Chronicon Prosper reports the matter differently.4
Heros, bishop of Arles, was a holy man and disciple of St. Martin. He was exiled by the people of the city though he was innocent and not accused of any fault. They replaced him with Patroclus, friend and confidant of Count Constance, a powerful figure in the empire. By this means the people of Arles claimed to obtain his good graces. This affair caused divisions among the bishops of the province.
(Zosimus’ account is difficult to harmonize with Prosper’s.) Speaking of Heros and Lazarus, Zosimus says: “When they left their sees, land and sea were scoured but no one could be found to bid for their services.” This statement does not harmonize well with a voluntary resignation.5
What is said against these two prelates probably stemmed from Patroclus.6 Pope Zosimus appears well disposed toward him and he was in Rome in September, 417,7 near the time Zosimus wrote against Heros and Lazarus and in favor of Pelagius and Caelestius. History does not speak well of Patroclus; he was capable of deceiving the pope and maintaining false pretensions by camouflage and lies.8
Tiro Prosper can not be accused of prejudice against the Pelagians and their partisans. According to him Patroclus had the temerity to sell prelatures and traffic...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.