Show Less
Restricted access

The Concept of Divine Love in the Context of the God-World Relationship


John C. Peckham

The Concept of Divine Love in the Context of the God-World Relationship addresses the significant and far-reaching theological conflict over the nature of God’s love, which is deeply rooted in broader conflicts regarding divine ontology and the nature of the God-world relationship. After engaging the traditional historical theology of love and recent exemplars of competing and influential conceptions of divine love, John C. Peckham seeks an alternative to the impasse by an extensive inductive investigation of the entire biblical canon in accordance with a final-form canonical approach to systematic theology, offering an alternative model of divine love that draws on the richness of the biblical text as canon and holds considerable implications for the God-world relationship.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

2 A Brief Survey of Divine Love in Historical Theology


| 39 →


A Brief Survey of Divine Love in Historical Theology

Plato’s Conception of Love

The following survey introduces the main themes and issues regarding divine love and provides a glimpse of the long history that offers context for this study. Major figures have been selected that demonstrate the nature of the issues involved.1 The issue of divine love in systematic theology has a long history, including a considerable connection to Greek philosophy. Therefore, discussions of divine love often begin with Plato.2 At least three main points of Plato’s doctrine are essential to this study: (1) his ontology of the two worlds, the supersensible and sensible, especially the veneration of timelessness, simplicity, immutability, self-sufficiency, and perfection; (2) the notion of the highest love as rational desire for the Good, the proton philon; and (3) the prominence of insufficiency and need as conditions of desirous love, which is limited to human love in contrast to divine love. Among other things, for Plato, eros is of a rational, purposive character and emotion is downplayed.3 “The Platonic lover ← 39 | 40 → rises above . . . leaving emotionality behind: his love is not an attempt to express or purify sensuous feelings but rather to supplant them by sheer rationality.”4 This fits with Plato’s idealization of reason and the reflective life of the philosopher.5 Perhaps Plato’s most discussed contribution, however, is his treatment of desirous love. It is difficult to extract Plato’s own view from his writings with any...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.