Borges and Western Philosophy
Chapter 3: Philosophy and Ideology: Dialectical Orientalism in Borges’ Writings
← 54 | 55 →
Philosophy and Ideology: Dialectical Orientalism in Borges’ Writings
“These are the lenses through which the Orient is experienced, and they shape the language, perception, and form of the encounter between East and West” (Said 1994, 58). Herein, Edward Said trenchantly argues that Western Orientalism is demonic in its power. In his seminal Orientalism (1978), he details the scope, internal consistency, and strata of this vast web of representations the West spreads over the Orient in an attempt to control and master it, believing it to constitute a “creeping danger.” It resembles the labyrinth Daedalus constructed in order to capture the minotaur. The image of the labyrinth is inaccurate, however, Said in effect believing that the web is so fine and well-made that even Westerners can no longer extract themselves from it.
I believe that Said would regard Jorge Luis Borges as an Orientalist par excellence. Not only does he appear to portray the East as mysterious and exotic – “something vast, immobile, magnificent, incomprehensible” – in typical Orientalist fashion but he also seems to accept the essentialist distinction between “East” and “West” (Borges 1984, 42). From a Saidian perspective, his writings thus embody Orientalist mental structures that serve as, in William Blake’s phrase, “mind-forg’d manacles.” In this article, I shall argue that this assessment is quite erroneous, Borges in fact presenting an aesthetic-philosophical alternative to Saidian political-ideological Orientalism – a transcultural, critical, and above all philosophical stance (in the Socratic sense...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.