Research into the analysis of classroom-based writing is replete with techniques and methods meant to bring clarity to the question of how to best conduct instruction and assessment. Findings and suggestions for practice are rooted in a philosophy that asks teachers and linguists to judge students’ writing against a pre-determined standard. Too often, the results do little more than inform teachers and researchers as to which students met the standard and which did not.
This book offers research into the analysis of classroom writing that does not use a set standard or rubric to assess student writing but instead relies on insights from cognitive linguistics to explore the connections between cognition and language in student writing. The result is a creative and linguistically driven analysis of classroom writing that allows the linguist or teacher to view student writing on its own terms.
Adams, P., & McKusick, D. (2014). Steps and missteps: Redesigning, piloting, and scaling a developmental writing program. New Directions for Community Colleges, 167, 15–25. doi: 10.1002/cc.20107.
ngel, N. L. M., & García, J. M. M. (2017). Improving English language learners’ academic writing: a multi-strategy approach to a multi-dimensional challenge. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 14, 49–67. Retrieved from
Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 38–46. doi: 10.1109/47.749366.
Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27. Retrieved from
Aristotle (1996). Topics (trans. R. Smith). New York: Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., and Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13(3), 263–308. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90012-4.
Asaf, L. C. (2014). Supporting English language learners’ writing abilities: Exploring third spaces. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(1), 1–17. Retrieved from
Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00123-6.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 54(2), 153–160. doi: 10.1093/elt/54.2.153.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.