The Perpetual French Discovery of Australian Cinema
3. Points of View 31
31 3. Points of View Film Criticism, Film Journals and Press Reviews in France Ceux qui théorisent, ceux qui connotent, ceux qui déconnotent ceux qui critiquent scientifique, ceux qui distancient, ceux qui brechtisent, ceux qui ratissent l’esthétisme, ceux qui mitraillent le subjectivisme, ceux qui fusillent l’impressionnisme, ceux qui bombardent l’éclectisme, ceux qui napalment le cinéma spectacle, ils sont bien beaux et bien gentils, mais ils m’ennuient à crever, avec leurs grosses têtes et leurs petites pointes Bic, et leurs révolutions en chambres de bonne. Henry Moret (editorial in Ecran, no. 2, February 1972) In his disparaging analysis of the state of French film criticism in 1972, Henry Moret indulges in a degree of cynicism similar to that of the colleagues he denounces for their self-importance and for the subjective fundamentalism of their approach to film criticism. Nevertheless, Moret’s observations reveal two contex- tual points that are important to our understanding of the nature of French film criticism, and more particularly, to our consi- deration of the issues surrounding the French critical reception of Australian cinema. Firstly, it is clear from Moret’s broad assertions that the vit- riol demonstrated by critics such as Louis Chauvet of Le Figaro in his condemnation of Giorgio Mangiamele’s Clay in 1965, which will be discussed in the next chapter, is by no means limited to the reception of Australian films. The severity of the terms used 32 by Moret to describe the manner in which his colleagues ‘shoot down’...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.