A Text-Oriented Study of Placement Practices
8. Conclusion and Reflection 215
215 8 Conclusion and Reflection [R]eflective practice [is …] a process that is undertaken in response to a positive or negative event that may be initiated consciously or subconsciously, that requires analysis to provide an answer or insight. (Chapman/Dempsey/ Warren-Forward 2009: 167) This chapter first summarises the major findings of the study with regard to the research questions set out in Chapter 1, and then highlights the ways in which this study illuminates the understanding of the discourse of learning to write professional genres in the context of placement and the linguistic aspects of a community of practice (CoP). The contributions of this study will thus be outlined in terms of theory, methodology and pedagogy. After that, I will state the limitations of this workplace research mainly with respect to data collection and then extrapolate from the findings to look at implica- tions for further research. 8.1. Summary of major research findings This section will begin by restating the constituents of placements. Then I will summarise the major empirical findings of this study in order to answer the research questions (RQs) set out in Chapter 1, which can be reinterpreted in two dimensions: (1) discourse of learning-to-write in placement and (2) construction and manifestation of the textually derived interpretation of roles in relation to STWs’ social identities. At the end of this section, the concept of practice will be revisited in relation to these three dimensions. 216 8.1.1. The constituents of placement This study argues for a more complex understanding...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.