Show Less

Doctoral Education’s Reform in Switzerland and Norway

A Public Management Analysis

Lukas Baschung

Since the beginning of the 21 st century, doctoral education has gained an increasingly important place on the reform agenda of higher education institutions and also at national and European policy levels. By paying particular attention to the characteristics and role of recently emerged Doctoral and Research Schools, this book examines on a broad empirical basis what this reform consists of in two small but scientifically and economically successful countries – Switzerland and Norway. This reform also raises the question to what extent power shifts take place regarding the doctoral process. Thus, does the «Thesis director» lose his or her power at the expense of other actors? Observed shifts are characterised through components of varying Public Management Narratives. In order to consider existing variety, case studies have been chosen on the basis of four variables – type of national political system, size and type of higher education institution and type of scientific discipline. This methodological framework allows not only illustrating variation in the reform process and its causes but also the development of a new University Governance Scheme.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Bibliography 311

Extract

Bibliography Allen, C.M., Smyth, E.M. and Wahlstrom, M. (2002). “Responding to the Field and to the Academy: Ontario’s evolving PhD”. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(2): 203-214. Amaral, A., Fulton, O., and Larsen, I.M. (2003). “A Managerial Revolution?”. In Amaral, A., Meek, V.L. and Larsen, I.M. (Eds.), The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.275-294. Asklin, B. and Stensaker, B. (2002). “Academic Leadership: Prescriptions, Practices and Paradoxes”. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(2): 113-125. Auriol, L. (2007). “Labour Market Characteristics and International Mobility of Doctorate Holders: Results for Seven Countries”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2007/2, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/310254328811. Austin, A.E. (2002). “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty. Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career”. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1): 94-122. Bache, I, Flinders, M. (Eds.) (2005). Multi-level Governance. New York: Oxford University Press. Bartelse, J., Beerkens, H.J.J.G. and Maassen, P.A.M. (2000). “Graduate Education in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom”. In National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies (Ed.), Graduate Education Reform in Europe, Asia, and the Americas and International Mobility of Scientists and Engineers, Proceedings of an NSF Workshop. Arlington, VA: NSF, pp.101-184. Baschung, L. (2008). “Inventaires des standards minimaux relatifs au doctorat”. Rapport final à l’intention de la Conférence des Recteurs des Universités Suisses, CRUS, OSPS. 312 Baschung, L. (2010). “Changes in the management of doctoral education. A case study analysis based on three Public Management narratives”. European Journal of Education, 45(1)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.