Diplomatie et politique étrangère au 20e siècle / Foreign Policy and Diplomacy in the 20th Century
Edited By Claire Sanderson and Mélanie Torrent
This study addresses transformations in British diplomacy and foreign policy through the long-term perspectives of imperial decline, European integration and transatlantic relations. From the Royal Navy of Admiral Sir John Fisher to contemporary nuclear policy, the authors analyse Britain’s capacity to adapt its international practices, and the driving forces and constraints behind them. Using case studies based on newly available archives and including regions that tend to be marginalised, they show the influence of individuals, the importance of networks and the evolution of the consultation and decision-making processes, in contexts of both crisis and daily management. On a local, global, bilateral and multilateral scale, the book offers a critical perspective of the cultural practices and intellectual trends underlying British diplomacy and foreign policy in the 20th century, from Brussels to Washington, from the Falkland Islands to Africa, from the United Nations to the Commonwealth of Nations.
Laurence Cros The Canadian Constitution, adopted with the Confederation in 1867, stated that external affairs were to remain in the hands of the imperial authorities: only internal autonomy was granted to the young Dominion. But the proximity of the United States had long encouraged Canada to defend its interests in Anglo-American relations, and Canada’s control over its external relations did not simply begin with the creation of the Department of External Affairs in 1909. However, it was really in the 1920s and 1930s that Canada began to press for total diplomatic autonomy, when the Department of External Affairs developed under the Liberal Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King and his Under-Secretary for External Affairs, Oscar D. Skelton. Partly acknowledged during the First World War, Canada’s external autonomy was fully accepted with the imperial conference of 1926 and the Balfour Declaration. As this evolution was negotiated, Canadian and British diplomats redefined imperial relations and the links between the metropole and the Dominions. Richard Davis This chapter analyses the debate on Churchill’s ‘three circles’ theory and what this debate tells us about the nature, the conduct and the objectives of British foreign policy since 1945. What does it tell us about the way in which successive British leaders have seen Britain and its place in the world? Secondly, how convincing has this theory been in practice and how has it has stood up as an analytical tool of British policy? That Britain has simultaneously operated within the ‘three circles’ is clear. So...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.