Sculpture through its Material Histories
Catherine Chevillot - Nineteenth-Century Sculpteurs and Mouleurs: Developments in Theory and Practice 201
Catherine Chevillot Nineteenth-Century Sculpteurs and Mouleurs: Developments in Theory and Practice If nineteenth-century sculpture illustrated in a particularly important way the vagaries of taste and their destructive ef fect on the conservation of works of art, plaster casts, by comparison, were the concentrated target of unequalled disdain. This disdain was reinforced by the discrediting of the material itself (plaster being seen as an integral part of the casting process), and of the status of plaster casts (which by the early twentieth century were no longer deemed to have any educational value) (Fig. 9.1). This rejection was somewhat paradoxical, given that the overwhelming majority of origi- nal models in the twentieth century were made from plaster. Over the last 20 years, as the rediscovery of this material has progressed, new research has allowed us to examine afresh the role of the material and the mouleurs (mould-makers) in the artistic process. Even though plaster casts were more frequently used by sculptors than bronze or carved marble – or perhaps precisely for that reason – the techniques of using plaster and plastic materials are still, in many ways, relatively unknown. The same is true of many aspects of the creative pro- cess, such as the relationships between artists and the many trades linked to dif ferent sculptural techniques (plaster manufacturers, plaster merchants, reducers and enlargers, mould-makers and sellers or edition-makers), and how to define the role of the sculptor in the various processes (for exam- ple, whether the sculptor reworks the plaster). Very little information...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.