Show Less

Britishness, Identity and Citizenship

The View From Abroad


Edited By Catherine McGlynn, Andrew Mycock and J.W. McAuley

This volume is an exciting contribution to debates about identity and citizenship both in the UK and elsewhere. By examining the view from abroad, through popular cultural transmission, education, and travel and migration, the transnational nature of Britishness and the political and cultural dynamism of the concept and its contemporary relevance becomes apparent. The multi-layered relationships uncovered in this work have historically shaped both the transmission and reception of Britishness and continue to do so. The international group of contributors, from a range of disciplinary backgrounds, synthesise contemporary and historical debates about Britishness to offer a vital breadth to a debate that is becoming increasingly narrow and introspective in the UK.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Section One - The Empire: Constructions of Britishness - 9


Section One The Empire: Constructions of Britishness Charles V. Reed 1 Respectable Subjects of the Queen: The Royal Tour of 1901 and Imperial Citizenship in South Africa Historian Vivian Bickford-Smith has recently characterized Britishness as South Africa’s ‘forgotten nationalism,’ lost in a historiography that pays far more attention to African and Afrikaner nationalisms than to Britishness.1 It has been remembered, we might suggest, in a f lurry of recent scholarship on the subject. Historians of the ‘British world,’ for instance, have under- stood Britishness as a kind of trans-nationalism, born out of the diaspora of British ideas, institutions, and people throughout the world. At the same time, scholars of Britishness have been apt to stress that it was not some pre-packaged set of ideas or identities, but the product of complex historical discourses and processes mediated and remade by local percep- tions and encounters. This chapter explores the reception of the 1901 royal tour to South Africa by the independent African press, the editors of which imagined the British Empire to be their political and cultural universes. Scholars, however, have rarely presented Western-educated people of colour in such a light. Post-colonial and other area studies scholars have treated the historical actors presented here in skilful and sophisticated ways but struggle perhaps too diligently to excise them from the spectre of collaboration, to really see them as sly subverters of the colonial order or to understand ‘mimicry’ as a form of anti-colonial resistance.2 On the 1 V. Bickford-Smith, ‘Writing...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.