A History of a Christian Doctrine and Its Interpretation
Chapter Six Reclaiming Divine Wrath: An Apologetics for Contemporary Christian Theology and Preaching 253
Chapter Six Reclaiming Divine Wrath: An Apologetics for Contemporary Christian Theology and Preaching As I first considered the topic of this book, I grappled with the idea of labeling divine wrath as a “lost doctrine.” Throughout the course of the history of the Christian traditions, certain ideas about God have ebbed and f lowed, risen and seceded, waxed and waned. In this sense, I appreciate Paul Tillich’s ideas of symbols, that they have a lifespan in which they are born, develop, f lourish, wither, atrophy, and eventually die. In a certain sense, my fear is that contemporary Christian proclamation has lost faith in an aspect of God, and is giving up naively on the wrath of God. My concern is that this loss of faith appears not only through the proclamation present in the academic work of the systematic theology done in service to the ecclesia, but also in the proclamation of fered from the pulpits of the congregations that are knit together in the body of Christ. It is my conviction that the wrath of God is something that believing Christians must neither reject, nor set aside in neglect. It is the very thesis of this book that we should reclaim divine wrath for Christian theology and preaching. Divine wrath should not, must not, become a “lost doctrine.” There are those who have rejected this representation of God, who find the idea of the wrath of God to be abhorrent and incompatible with the idea of the loving God...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.