Word and Image in France, 1880–1926
IntroductionInterchange and Rivalry between the Arts 1
Introduction Interchange and Rivalry between the Arts In 1893, Alphonse Germain, art critic for the Symbolist periodical Art et critique, mocked the attempts of literary men to express their thoughts on painting: ‘Because they have read a whole library, writers believe themselves readily able to hold forth on anything […] Alas! Most of them only see paintings and sculptures through their reading’. Literature and painting operated according to such distinct criteria, he explained, that a written account could rarely do justice to a work of visual art: Writers talk about painting in the same way that they talk about a book: they borrow their criteria from their own art, an art which has practically no connections with pictorial art. They do not realise […] that literature evokes images through ideas, by means of conventional signs, words; while plastic art can only evoke ideas through images, by means of that universally comprehensible sign: Form.1 Germain’s conviction that ‘ideas’ are the essence of poetry, ‘forms’ the sub- stance of painting was central to turn-of-the-century beliefs about the rela- tion between visual art and literature. It appeared to be echoed by Maurice Denis, for example, in an 1895 article recalling the development of Symbolist painting. Referring to the early Synthetist experiments of Paul Gauguin, Emile Bernard and Louis Anquetin, Denis regretted that ‘there is a tendency 1 ‘Parce qu’ils ont lu une bibliothèque, les écrivains se croient facilement aptes à dis- serter sur tout […] Las! La plupart ne voient tableaux et statues qu’à travers leurs...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.