Commemoration and Contestation in Post-Dictatorship Argentina and Uruguay
Chapter 2: A Tale of Two Transitions: Shifting Impunity in the Long Aftermath of State Repression
← 42 | 43 →
A Tale of Two Transitions: Shifting Impunity in the Long Aftermath of State Repression
Nadie rinde cuentas, nadie brinda explicaciones. Cada crimen es una dolorosa incertidumbre para los seres cercanos a la víctima y también una advertencia para todos los demás. El terrorismo de estado se propone paralizar a la población por el miedo.
[Nobody is called to account, nobody offers explanations. Each crime brings painful uncertainty for the victim’s loved ones and also serves as a warning to everyone else. State terrorism aims to paralyze the population with fear.] —Eduardo Galeano1
The wide-reaching effects of the unprecedented human rights violations ushered in by Argentina and Uruguay’s respective coups of 1973 and 1976 have shaped the post-dictatorship periods profoundly. This chapter explores the human rights violations under consideration and the manifold ways in which they have been addressed by state and society, with the aim of elucidating the ‘shifting impunity’ intrinsic to this study. Although this chapter is primarily concerned with legal impunity (the failure to hold the perpetrators to account) and the ways in which successive post-dictatorship societies have addressed the past through political and judicial means, it also traces the broader cultural shifts that have taken place since the end of dictatorial rule and the ways in which questions of justice and impunity reverberate ← 43 | 44 → beyond the legal sphere. In this way, the chapter establishes the distinct yet comparable...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.