Sabine Zubarik – The Ethics of Time: Stasis and Dilation in Thomas Lehr’s 42 and Svend Age Madsen’s Days with Diam
← 270 | 271 →
The Ethics of Time: Stasis and Dilation in Thomas Lehr’s 42 and Svend Age Madsen’s Days with Diam
The conjunction of time and ethics into a genitive compound seems to establish an odd semantic alliance that raises questions: is time an ethical category? Are ethics dependant on a fixed concept of the nature of time? Does the notion of “good/bad behaviour” and “proper conduct” exist outside of any temporal dimension? Dealing with the relationship between ethics and time, as the various essays do in the anthology Time and Ethics,1 for example, instantly makes clear that our whole belief system of practical ethics and moral conduct is connected exclusively with the supposition of a constant, unidirectional and one-dimensional timeline, objective and independent of the observer, and hence with clear distinctions between past, present and future. Our social apparatus of judging, punishing and regulating behaviour relies on the laws of causality and identity: how could deeds be punished if we could not claim certainty about the existence of cause and effect and the one-ness of an individual in his or her vectorial timeline? Concepts of time and temporality that differ from these assumptions (cause and effect due to an objective, one-dimensional timeline) render the application of our established ethical system difficult or even impossible.
Meanwhile, during the last century, new physics have postulated various alternatives to the understanding of time: the relativity of time is proven, quantum physics have...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.