Edited By Gregory Hulsman and Caoimhe Whelan
‘Them which possess the places erected by our ancestors’: Sacred Space and Conflict in Ireland (1603–1633) (Stephen Hand)
← 190 | 191 →STEPHEN HAND
‘Them which possess the places erected by our ancestors’: Sacred Space and Conflict in Ireland (1603–1633)
At the beginning of the seventeenth century, the state of Catholic religious practice in Ireland was far from the ideal diocesan framework outlined at the council of Trent (1545–1563).1 Without a coherent parish structure and deprived of most of their traditional sacred spaces by the English administration, Irish Catholics implemented a largely clandestine episcopate to carry out their religious practices. This often required renting secular properties, using private dwellings or even holding ceremonies in fields, forests or bogs.2 Suppressing their churches and seizing their lands was not only economically beneficial to the state, but also served ← 191 | 192 →to neutralise potential rallying points for Catholic nationalism.3 The subjugation of Irish Catholics in this way was, indeed, viewed as necessary to prevent an escalation of conflict. At various times, however, in the early seventeenth century, conflict did break out.4 This chapter will analyse the reaction of the state to Catholics both using their historic ecclesiastical sites and attempting to recover their lost places of worship. To this end, it will treat of four major flashpoints which occurred during this period. These events are the Recusancy Revolt of 1603, the unofficial Catholic use of a Protestant church at the town of Kilkenny in Westmeath in 1622, the suppression of the Cook Street Friary in Dublin in 1629, and the destruction in 1632 of the pilgrim...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.