Essays on Utopian Thought and Practice
Edited By Michael J. Griffin and Tom Moylan
Truth, Temporality, and Theorizing Resistance
← 45 | 46 → ← 46 | 47 → SUSAN MCMANUS
A spectral moment, a moment that no longer belongs to time, if one understands by this word the linking of modalized presents […] Furtive and untimely, the specter does not belong to that time.
—JACQUES DERRIDA, Specters of Marx
And you should know that the zapatista dead are very restless and talkative. They still speak, despite being dead, and they’re shouting history. They’re shouting it so that it can’t go to sleep, so that memory won’t die, so that our dead will live, shouting.
—SUBCOMMANDANTE MARCOS, Our Word Is Our Weapon
The complicated problem of truth forms a reinvigorated horizon in contemporary radical, critical, and utopian political theory. This horizon is shaped by four aspects: first, the reclaiming and refunctioning of “truth” as a cognitive form that is at once situated and perspectival, as well as anticipatory, “fictive,” or imaginative; second, the possibility that such truths can be deployed to cultivate “combative lucidity” or transformative knowledges of, and orientations within, the world; third, the ways in which the “affective register” of the subject can enhance ethical energies and political agency; and fourth, the possibilities that inhere in temporality itself.1 These aspects ← 47 | 48 → of the horizon of truth overlap. For theorists such as Jacques Derrida, Alain Badiou, and Antonio Negri, for example, figures of truth are theorized via the disordering effects of spectrality, the radical interruption of the Event, or the imaginative refusal invoked by...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.