Show Less
Restricted access

Dimensions of the Logical

A Hermeneutic Inquiry

Friedrich Hogemann

Drawing on the work of Georg Misch, this work seeks to give back to the Word its original fullness of meaning. Misch’s notion of a logic of life considers the Word in the plenitude of its great powers. The question of life leads the inquiries undertaken in this study via Misch’s anthropological conception on to the phenomenological ontology of Martin Heidegger and Josef Koenig’s investigation of ‘Being and Thought’. Heidegger’s quest for the meaning of Being calls for a close inspection of its linguistic foundation. ‘Being’ reveals itself as the original truth. It is the verbum demonstrativum in its verbal form. Solely to Indo-European languages is this form immanent. Thus, the established basis may be the starting point from which to reconsider the question of tradition as well as constructs of higher levels.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Section Two. ‘To be’ as transcendens. Philosophy and non-philosophy

Extract



Introduction

The point of departure for our reflections are again the meanings of ‘to be’ that were mentioned above (pp. 193 ff.). It depends on the posing of the question as to the content and operation of the verb ‘to be’. Both together arise from transcendental interrogation. We have already (p. 211 ff.) raised the question as to the content of the transcendens ‘to live’ because the information provided by grammar seemed insufficient. What was earlier a marginal matter must now become central.

But what does talk of the content of this verb mean? ‘Being is obviously not a real predicate’, writes Kant in his Of the impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the Existence of God’ (Werke III, p. 401). This essential feature of the verb ‘to be’ now occupies the foreground. Therefore the following matters will have to be discussed:

The first chapter: Josef König’s distinction between modifying and determining predication. König would probably have demurred at the thought of his analyses being part of an ontological treatise. However, what we are attempting here is based on linguistic analysis. So it is remote from an ontology in the traditional sense. It is quite close to what he himself was aiming at.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.