Legal Restrictions on Statements and Interpretations of the Past in Germany, Poland, Rwanda, Turkey and Ukraine
Edited By Klaus Bachmann and Christian Garuka
Why do states ban certain statements and interpretations of the past, how do they ban them and what are the practical consequences? This book offers an answer to these questions and at the same time examines, whether the respective legislation was supply-or demand-driven and how prosecutors and courts applied it. The comparison between Germany, Poland, Ukraine, Rwanda and Turkey offers several surprising insights: in most countries, memory law legislation is supply driven and imposed on a reluctant society, in some countries they target apolitical hooligans more than intellectuals or the government’s political opponents. The book also discusses, why and how liberal democracies differ from hybrid regimes in their approach to punitive memory laws and how such laws can be tailored to avoid constraints on free speech, the freedom of the press and academic freedoms.
Bibliographic Information published by the DeutscheNationalbibliothekThe Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication inthe Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographicdata is available in the internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataA CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at theLibrary of Congress.
This publication was sponsored by the Polish Ministry ofScience and Higher Education in the framework of the project“Criminalizing History”, BST3/2018D.
ISBN 978-3-631-80957-0 (Print)
E-ISBN 978-3-631-81352-2 (E-PDF)
E-ISBN 978-3-631-81353-9 (EPUB)
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.