I. Introduction to the theory of political opposition 15
15 I. Introduction to the theory of political opposition 1. What is opposition? In the first chapter of his monumental, and today quite classic, work on democracy, the legendary Italian political scientist Giovanni Sartori (1987: 7) writes, “If the term democracy can be used to signify antithetical entities and dignify antithetical practices, then it is a meaningless term. What are we talking about? The answer lies, to begin with, in definition.” Likewise, such an approach must necessarily be adopted towards the concept of opposition, which itself has various meanings leading to important theoretical conse- quences as well as equally significant practical consequences in Central Eu- rope and beyond. 1.1 General foundations The term opposition stems from the Latin word oppositus, which means positioned against, opposite. However, many other general definitions of this word exist: opposite, resistance against something, necessarily publicly ex- pressed (against opinions, acts, politics, etc.), parties or their parts, societal groups standing against the majority, against the ruling party or group, against dominant beliefs. Here the political connotations of the concept are already evident, albeit very generally. Basic encyclopedias define opposition in essentially the same manner. From these very vague definitions, we can infer the true degree of va- riability in ways of perceiving opposition, and we also see that opposition can have a general meaning, applicable to almost anything.1 In the introduc- tion to their classic work on political opposition, well known political scien- tists Ghita Ionescu and Isabel de Madariaga (1972: 14) open their analysis with...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.