An Empirical Explanation of Smooth Fund Returns
The analysis of the distribution of appraisals of German open-end fund’s Ger- man properties (chapter 2) has shown that in fund crisis year 2006 there have been significant differences of property valuation between funds’ portfolios. The arguably most likely explanation for different mean value changes of properties by portfolio is that funds exerted an influence on the valuation of their properties in the year 2006. Only those variables differ significantly in 2006 compared to 2005 and 2007 that are derived within the valuation process such as the change in market value, the change in rental value and the change in the year’s pur- chase. In contrast, the variables occupancy rate, change in occupancy rate and the percentage of ending leases, which are central input factors within the valua- tion process, do not change noticeably in 2006. This is further evidence that the valuation results were different in 2006 but not the relevant market develop- ments. The valuation results of GOEF properties in all the investigated foreign markets Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK (chapter 3) differ significantly from the valuations of the local market participants in the respec- tive markets. Especially when comparing GOEFs UK capital growth rates from Q1 2005 to Q1 2008 to IPD UK capital growth, a substantial smoothing effect is found. While the change in rental values is at least similar within GOEFs com- pared to IPD figures, the yield shift differs extremely. German open-end funds do not change the capitalization rates of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.