Show Less

The Legacy of Educational Administration

A Historical Analysis of an Academic Field

Izhar Oplatka

In light of attempts to trace the philosophical and historical foundations of educational administration as an academic field of study that is concerned with the management and operation of educational organisations, this book aims at reviewing important epistemological developments in this field since the early 1960s. Specifically, the author poses several questions, such as what counts as the field of educational administration and what is this field in each decade since the early 1960s? What is the knowledge base of educational administration? What is its unique identity? And what are the types of publications and the methodological tools used throughout the years by the field’s members? Based on a qualitative content analysis of the field’s various academic journals since the appearance of the first journal, the author identifies six legacies – empirical, practical, evaluative, training, ideological and critical that the field leaves behind in our time.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

References 185

Extract

185 References Altheide, D.L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage Publica- tions. Bates, R.J. (1980). Educational administration, the sociology of science, and the manage- ment of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 1-20. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open Univer- sity Press. Belth, M. (1962). Prospects for a discipline of education. Educational Theory, 12(4), 193- 204. Bialecki, I. (2001). Goals and policies of higher education reform. Higher Education in Europe, 26(3), 351-366. Bisschoff, T. (2008). Pragmatism and research in education management: A preliminary discussion paper. South African Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 1(1), 65-73. Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes: Universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44, 519-532. Bohme, G. (2005). Midwifery as science: An essay on the relation between scientific and everyday knowledge. In N. Stehr & V. Meja (eds.), Society and knowledge: Contem- porary perspectives in the sociology of knowledge and science (pp. 373-392). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Bottery, M. (2006). Context in the study and practice of leadership in education: A histori- cal perspective. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 38 (2), 169-183. Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14, 19-47. Boyan, N.J. (1981). Follow the leader: Commentary on research in educational adminis- tration. Educational Researcher, 12, 6-13. Boyan, N.J. (ed.) (1988). Handbook of Research on...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.