The crisis alluded to by Arendt at the outset of this dissertation, within the context of education in America at the beginning of the 60s, is nowhere near a solution which is evident in the discussion between Joseph Dunne and Alasdair MacIntyre in 2002 and will not receive an ultimate answer as stated in Dunne’s summary of their public dialogue: ‘I am very grateful for your answers to these questions - even though further questions arise to indicate that what we have been engaged in here is itself also a never completed task’ (MacIntyre and Dunne 2002, 19). I have tried to establish an argument that public education has good reason to promote a variety of different goals in life which its citizens can autonomously choose from. Autonomy rests with the individuals but the conditions for autonomy are granted by public institutions, which start at Kindergarten or even earlier in the quality of childcare. In order for the individual to experience and appreciate true autonomy and its responsibilities throughout the formative years education needs to aim at a level playing field. Selection of aims, whether internal through learning in heterogeneous groups or external through different institutions or sets within a school, will always take place but the fairness of the selective process will depend on the quality of human experience and learning starting with the very young. Although the aims may differ the human worth stays the same. In human terms the ‘slow’ learner counts the same as the ‘fast’...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.