Show Less

Barbara Skarga in Memoriam


Magdalena Sroda and Jacek Migasinski

This volume is dedicated to Barbara Skarga – her works, profile and biography. It is a unique character in the Polish intellectual life, but also virtually unknown abroad, except a meager milieu of her readership in France. Dubbed «the first Lady of Polish Philosophy» for a good reason, she contributed not only to shape of Polish Philosophy but to the style of public debate, too. The problem areas initiating her philosophy stemmed from the group of scholars called «the Warsaw school of history of Ideas» with its flagship names such as Leszek Kołakowski, Brinisław Baczko or Andrzej Walicki. On the other hand, her output originates from the extraordinary and dramatic events of her life. The philosophical output of Barbara Skarga is thus a proof of continuity and longevity of an important tradition of the 20 th century Polish Philosophy.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

III. Towards Metaphilosophy


The History of Science and the Intellectual Formations The history of science, a relatively new but increasingly popular field, has yet more problems than achievements. It is subject of discussions that touch many vital theoreti- cal issues are being raised. During the last few decades, clear changes have become more evident in the opinions regarding its general conception. In the works of the his- torians, however, these concepts tend to be rather seldom implemented. Many works have been published which speak of the life and work of scientists, of the history of particular discoveries and theories, even whole branches of science, scientific institu- tions, etc. However, only few of them speak about reasons why science took such-and- such shape in a given period of time. Exceptionally only science is associated with what can be called an intellectual formation. This is not to undermine the value of monographs, but as evidenced by the classic work of Koyré, this branch of study ap- pears to have a larger potential. Looking at these discussions, one can notice that they usually concern one main issue that is accounted in different ways, as if on different theoretical levels; therefore, different opposing parties are involved in them. The debates between scientists and philosophers who share differing opinions about science itself eventually turn into de- bates between Platonists and the followers of historical relativism. Ultimately, two positions that differ in the assessment and understanding of rationalism have emerged as the main opponents nowadays. These discussions and their...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.