Show Less

Between the Old and the New World

Studies in the History of Overseas Migrations


Edited By Agnieszka Malek and Dorota Praszalowicz

The volume contains papers presented at the fourth Workshop «American Ethnicity: Rethinking Old Issues, Asking New Questions» which took place in Krakow, Poland, on May 24 th -25 th , 2010. The event was organized by the Institute of American Studies and Polish Diaspora of the Jagiellonian University, and supported by the (American) Immigration and Ethnic History Society. The tradition of organizing bi-annual workshops goes back to 2004 and continues to be a forum for discussing ongoing research and sharing ideas. The texts included in this volume provide a comparative context to immigration studies, contribute to the gender perspective, bring up new issues and remind the most important aspects of migrants’ life, such as remittances and poverty. There is also a set of the articles on American Jewish experience, studied from a variety of angles, and the Polish-American section presenting texts on local immigrant communities.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Wolfgang Helbich: The Pitfalls of Macrohistory: the Case of Waterloo, Québec


The Pitfalls of Macrohistory: the Case of Waterloo, Québec Wolfgang Helbich (Ruhr Universität Bochum) When, back in the 1990s, I started out on my Waterloo project, I committed no less than three mortal sins. I did not have a theory to guide me and justify what I was about to do. Nor did I have a preconceived methodology. And while I nev- er doubted I was doing history, I had no idea which label for some subdiscipline or revisionism or especially “turn” of history I was supposed to paste on my work. But frankly, all that did not really worry me. What I did know were my overriding questions behind the simple title, “Bi- cultural Cohabitation in Waterloo, Québec”: How did Anglo and French Cana- dians get along in a face-to-face society with a sizeable representation of either group during a period for which sufficient source material is available, or what was their relationship? And how did they differ in their socio-economic data, their tastes and preferences, their local, provincial, and national politics? Final- ly, did living in a bicultural town result in attenuating conflicts that were acute elsewhere, and could living together even exert a mutual (or one-sided) influ- ence sufficient to effect some change in behavior or values of one or the other group? During the first stages of my project, when trying to explain my intentions to colleagues, I sometimes used the term “microhistory”. For more than a dec- ade, I had been researching...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.