Comparative Perspectives on East Asia
Edited By Unsuk Han, Takahiro Kondo, Biao Yang and Falk Pingel
Falk Pingel: Introduction
Falk Pingel Introduction The Past That Will Not Go Away – this phrase, taken from the title of an essay which stirred a historical dispute over the interpretation of the legacy of the Nazi dictatorship in Germany, became a catchword in the debate on Japan’s role in the Second World War in East Asia (see Kawakita’s essay in this volume). In spite of obvious differences between the Nazi racist policy of extermination and subjugation on the one hand and Japanese expansionist and aggressive author- itarian militarism on the other, the deeds of both regimes generated a call for re- conciliation with their former adversaries and compensation for the damages, injustice and losses they had inflicted on them. However, both societies re- sponded to this claim in different ways. For Germany, the admittance of guilt for crimes against humanity, material restitution, and reconciliatory efforts became a pre-condition for economic co- operation and the establishment of political-military alliances after the war.1 U.S. occupation policy in Japan followed similar principles to those applied to Germany, such as taking political and military leaders to court, dissolving economic and financial conglomerates, ordering demilitarization and reforming the education system. However, these measures did not help Japan in post-war years to build constructive relations with her neighboring states formerly occu- pied or annexed by her. Diplomatic as well as notable economic and cultural relations with communist China were only re-established in 1972. As Korea was excluded from the San Francisco Peace Conference, torn by war and divided into...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.