A Study of the Complementary Methods in Karl Barth and Jacques Derrida
Chapter VI: Conclusion 215
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION 1. The Case for Barth's Theology of Salvation Speaking the Language of the Unsayable or Non-meaning 1.1 Barth and Contemporary Theological Thought "Barth told Scholz that academic theology was based on the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. 'He looked at me earnestly and said: "That goes against all the laws of physics, mathematics and chemistry, but now I understand what you mean. '"" 1 In this quotation, Barth affirms the singularity and non-meaning of the act or "gift" of God, as explicated in Derridian terms. It is singular because it is based upon a historically attested event which defies the capacity of human beings to encapsulate in a construct, the event of God made man. Barth outraged his contemporary theologians by insisting upon the Christological particularity of this event and refusing to think of it in terms of contemporary human thought structures. This was a challenge to liberal theology2 which came out of the thought generated by Schleiermacher and which was developed in various directions by such theologians as Ritschl, Herrmann and Harnack. In recent years, liberal theology has somewhat given way to conservative modes of theological thought which have sought to re-emphasise biblical and classical dogmatic frames of reference such as is found in the theology of Gunton3 and Busch, E., Karl Barth, His Life From Lerters and Aurobiographical Texts, London: S.C.M., 1976, p.207. 2 See chapter II of this book. 3 Gun ton, C. See particularly, Becoming and Being: The Doctrine of God...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.