Image and Realities
Edited By Aydar Amrebaev, Hans-Georg Heinrich, Ludmilla Lobova and Valikhan Tuleshov
Hans-Georg Heinrich, Ludmilla Lobova, Summary and Conclusions
The record of post-Soviet Kazakhstan is a mixed bag of rich opportuni- ties, dashed hopes and drab realities. Kazakhstan won early rounds of applause for its handling of regional policy and has a catastrophic image in the West for its human rights conduct. This, however, eclipses cau- tious but real advances in bottom-up democratization. There are certainly unwritten rules which set limits for political opposition and criticism. Nev- ertheless – and this volume is a case in point – open criticism is a feature of Kazakhstan’s authoritarian system. Unsurprisingly, the Achilles heel of the grand schemes projected by an up-to-date legislative framework is implementation on the ground. The shortcomings of evolving or continuing practices prompt demands for the revision of the legislative basis in their turn. The country can boast a vi- brant civil society which is definitely no fig leaf put up by the government in order to improve its international image. It is, among other things, a provider of important social services, it fills a gap in the activities of gov- ernmental and budget-financed institutions; and last not least, it is a pro- vider of jobs. Civil society regards itself as a champion of modernization. Modernization and Europeanization implies looking for and adopting Eu- ropean and, where appropriate, post-Soviet best practices. The Euro- pean Union recognizes the importance of Kazakhstan as a regional front runner, a fuel provider and security partner, particularly as a backstop for the ISAF and other missions to Afghanistan. The various strategies and dialogues, however, are...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.