Show Less

Jüdisch-hellenistische Literatur in ihrem interkulturellen Kontext

Martina Hirschberger

Unter jüdisch-hellenistischer Literatur versteht man im Allgemeinen die von Juden im Zeitalter des Hellenismus und der Kaiserzeit in griechischer Sprache abgefasste Literatur. Wie das Bindestrichwort bereits andeutet, ist jüdisch-hellenistische Literatur eine Literatur zwischen Sprachen und Kulturen. Die Beiträge dieses Bandes beleuchten jüdisch-hellenistische Literatur in ihrem historischen und kulturellen Kontext und berücksichtigen auch ihre Rezeptionsgeschichte. Der Band enthält Aufsätze zu Aristobulos von Paneas, Philon von Alexandria, Flavius Josephus, dem Aristeasbrief, den Makkabäerbüchern, 3 Esra und dem wenig bekannten apokryphen Werk Buch der Worte von Jannes und Jambres.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Parthian Women in Flavius Josephus. Leonardo Gregoratti


Parthian Women in Flavius Josephus Leonardo Gregoratti From Crassus’s disastrous defeat in the mid-1st century B.C. to the early decades of the 3rd century A. D., Rome’s expansionist goals in the East were fiercely op- posed by the Parthians. This kingdom was established after Alexander’s death, in central Asia, close to the remotest borders of the Seleucid Empire1. Its mon- archs, members of the Arsacid dynasty, were able to exploit the weakening and the consequent disintegration of that huge Hellenistic state and spread their con- trol over South-western Asia. By the period of the struggle with Rome, the long- established Arsacid rule stretched from the Euphrates to north-western India, in- cluding Mesopotamia, the whole Iranian plateau and all the territories lying be- tween the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean to the south and the Caspian Sea and the Caucasus to the north. A quick look at the map of the Arsacid domains is enough to understand clearly that the Parthian empire was a geographically imposing political subject, a worthy heir of the legendary oriental empires which preceded it: the Assyrian, the Babylonian, the Achaemenid, that of Alexander and the Seleucid one. In comparison with many of them the Parthian kingdom was even far more long lasting. Unfortunately, any scholar dealing with Parthian antiquities sadly knows, that in spite of such geographical and chronological relevance the sour- ces at disposal to reconstruct the history and the administrative structure of the Arsacid kingdom are scarce. Modern research complains the lack of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.