Lessons from the U.S. and Germany
Collective bargaining in the U.S. and Germany: The rise and fall of Fordist wage regulation
This chapter places China within the broader historical development of accumulation regimes and regulation modes that set the stage for world capitalism. Before delving into the problem of China, two distinctive cases - the United States and Germany - are analyzed to show common factors that have led to the formation of collective bargaining and also impacted its social impacts. This study examines the history of industrial development in the U.S. and Germany, with a particular focus on the period between the two World Wars. It was not only this time when post-war Fordism had taken form, including the institutionalization of collective bargaining, but this period also marked a profound impact on the different structures and functions of the systems of industrial relations up to the present day. Thus, the country cases starts from comparing their distinctive institutions and functions of collective bargaining. Moreover, the original causes of such two distinctive models - the similarities and differences of industrial, social and political conditions in the process of institution-building - are carefully analyzed. In the two historical cases, the inter-linkage between the mode of regulation and the regime of accumulation at historical certain stages is further clarified. Lessons are drawn from the advantages and disadvantages of the two collective bargaining and industrial relation systems, which is in large part mainly determined by whether they facilitate or block the development of intensive accumulation regimes, typically machine-based mass production at the time. 2.1 Two systems of industrial relations Throughout the golden age of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.