Show Less

Accounting for R&D Investments According to IAS 38

And the Conflicting Forces that Shape Financial Accounting: An Empirical Analysis

Series:

Michael Ordosch

The thesis empirically investigates two conflicting views on the accounting treatment of R&D outlays according to IAS 38. Proponents of a capitalization of R&D outlays argue that this accounting policy provides relevant information to investors. In contrast, those opposing such a capitalization state that the resulting asset is too uncertain. The findings demonstrate that the arguments of both supporters and opponents basically remain valid and are therefore to some extent incompatible. However, given this incompatibility a discussion of the empirical findings in context with the arguments brought forward within the political debate surrounding IAS 38 illustrates that IAS 38 eventually pursues a reasonable approach to balance these conflicting views.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

References

Extract

Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (1998). The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 161-191. Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (2000). Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. Journal of Finance, 55, 2747-2766. Aboody, D., Hughes, J., & Liu, J. (2002). Measuring value relevance in a (pos- sibly) inefficient market. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 965-986. Abrahams, T., & Sidhu, B. K. (1998). The role of R&D capitalisations in firm valuation and performance measurement. Australian Journal of Manage- ment, 23, 169-183. Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economcis, 43, 411-437. Ahmed, A. S., Billings, B. K., Morton, R. M., & Stanford-Harris, M. (2002). The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review, 77, 867-890. Ahmed, K., & Falk, H. (2006). The value relevance of management’s research and development reporting choice: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25, 231-264. Ahmed, K., & Falk, H. (2009). The riskiness of future benefits: The case of ca- pitalization of R&D and capital expenditures. Journal of International Accounting Research, 8, 45-60. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500. Alfredson, K., Leo, K., Picker, R., Loftus, J., Clark, K., & Wise, V. (2009). Ap- plying international financial reporting standards (2nd ed.). Milton: Wiley Australia. Ali, A., & Hwang, L.-S. (2000). Country-specific factors related to financial...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.