Is the Agreement Actually the Cunning Manoeuvre it has been Dubbed?
Chapter 1 of this thesis states in its subtitle (the hypothesis and thesis methodol- ogy) states that the points of discussion in the thesis will be supported by data gathered through interviews with IP and public health experts. The thesis has presented a duel between two opposing sides; the pharmaceutical compa- nies/TRIPS on the one side and public health issues on the other. The ensuing legal tussle has raised a lot of pertinent legal questions. The interviews were, therefore, conducted with the goal of not only answering some of the problem- atic research questions raised in the thesis through a completely different lens but also clarifying and tying up some of the loose ends in the thesis and giving them an objective view. Express permission to include each of the annexes used in this thesis was obtained from the persons interviewed. Those interviewed are alphabetically catalogued below. Annex 1 7 December 2011 Interview with Dr Heinz Hammann, Corporate Director-Patents, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Germany, and Mrs Zinta Krumins, Head of Region PM/CHC Middle East, Asia and Africa, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Germany Brenda Mey: How instrumental has Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma been in transferring medical technology to developing countries such as Kenya and India? Why was Cosmos’ CL application, which was filed under article 80 of the IPA, 2001 settled with a voluntary licence? Did the technology transfer agreement you signed with Cosmos Ltd in 2004 boost access to medicines in Kenya? Heinz Hammann: Our decision to...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.