Sudan remains an unstable state with cycles of ruthless civil wars1 that devastate its infrastructure2, threaten its territorial integrity3, flaw its economic growth and engender woeful humanitarian destitution4 and catastrophes.5 The objectives of these wars emanate from religious, economic and cultural settings. In the North- ern Sudan, the Islamic religion is associated with the Arabic language, culture and race, due to its association with the Middle East. On the other hand, the con- cerns of the population of the South consist of economic deprivation of its region, limited participation in power sharing and the systematic threats to its Christian, Animist and African cultural identity.6 This research explores how decision-makers in Sudan address these com- plex objectives in a national constitution for the citizens. Since, 1958 to present day, major political parties in Sudan fail several times to reach a consensus to legislate a unified constitutional system. The Islamic political parties of Umma with its sect, Ansar, Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) with its al-Khatimyyia sect and the National Islamic Front (NIF), which has rifted into the National Congress Party (NCP) and currently leads by the President Omer Hassan Ahmed Al-Bashir and the Popular Congress Party (PCP), under the leadership 1 Johnson, Douglas Hamilton. “The Sudan People’s liberation Army & the Problem of Fac- tionalism” in Christopher Clamham (ed.) (1998). African Guerrillas, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 60-61. Civil violence in Sudan started in 1955 and ended in 1972 and resumed in 1983. 2 Leopold, Mark (2005). Inside West Nile, Violence, History & Representation...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.