The successive phases of politics in modern Sudan, since the time of its founda- tion to present time manifest dynamics of racism and discrimination in national institutions of the state. All the democratic and military systems which have been in power, since the independence of Sudan from Great Britain, until now came from the Islamic-Arab North of Sudan with exception of General Ibrahim Abboud from the Beja of the eastern Sudan. The political logic of all the suc- cessive rulers in construction of national identity constitutionally does not con- sider the existing religious and linguistic diversities of institutions in the country as essential reality. Therefore, it applies an ethnic territorial nationalism model that adopts monolithic religious laws derived from Sharia and imposes Arabic as an official language of working and communication in national institutions of the country. In this way, the non-Muslim and the non-Arab citizens become the victims of religious discrimination and ethnic racism in sharing of power and national wealth. Thus, the majority of students from Darfur, South Sudan, Nuba Mountains and east Sudan of the Beja ethnic group reject this model and some identify it as ‘anomia assimilation’. Anomia assimilation is defined as a difficulty that faces an intended person for assimilation to find a word that can describe the measures taken by power in state in eradicating diversity and imposing unifor- mity of cultures in Sudan. In other words, its application in public institutions creates a difficulty in the mind of an affected person to find...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.