Optionality and overgeneralisation patterns in second language acquisition: Where has the expletive ensconced «it»self?
5. Two studies
131 5. Two studies In order to empirically check the rate of L2A of argument structure and argu- ment licensing, impersonal constructions and voice alternations in general, two studies have been conducted. These two studies are dubbed (i) ‘L2 GE test’ for L2 German, and (ii) ‘L2 RU test’ for L2 Russian, respectively. First, the concept of both tests and the motivation behind the choice of this kind of survey are stated. Then, the methodology of data elicitation and procedures are described. Subse- quently, both studies are separately analysed with respect to the constructions under investigation. I provide statistical evaluation of both averages and statisti- cal variation within clusters. The evaluation proceeds across levels of acquisition (four levels each language) as well as across first languages with respect to L2 GE (which is helpful for estimating the rate and range of parameter resetting in L2A). Crucially, certain constructions (e.g. ImpPass in ‘L2 GE’ and AdvImp in ‘L2 RU’) have proven to be a recalcitrant task to accomplish even with the very advanced L2ers (and across L1s for L2 GE). These facts point out that there are certain deficits in interlanguage grammars due to be explained. 5.1 Methodology, informants, and data elicitation Both studies, ‘L2 GE’ and ‘L2 RU’, have been designed alike, with two themati- cally cognate components: (i) a cloze test à 13 and 12 gaps with 241 and 190 words respectively, and (ii) a grammaticality judgement task (GJT) consisting of 37 questions. The questionnaires were conducted in written form....
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.