From Heraclitus to the Sophists
6. The Sophists
The word “sophist” sounds to modern ears rather defam- atory, rather than as an attempt to imply serious reﬂ ec- tion. But the Greek word soﬁ stés in the 5th century was a rather neutral term and generally referred to anyone who knew speciﬁ c, signiﬁ cant knowledge. It is no sur- prise that the sophists as vocational teachers received this designation as their own. The idea of a sophist as a “professional liar,” who misused skills for his/her own enrichment, is mainly a legacy of Plato and Aristotle. The Sophists opened new topics and transferred empha- sis to new areas with the person at the centre of their interest. Even past thinking thematised the relationship between a person and the world and opened the door to the criticism of human capabilities to adequately per- ceive and cognise. Sophists increased these tendencies even further. 82 6.1 The Historical Context of Sophists The rise of sophists, which can hardly be described as a single movement, is inextricably linked to the devel- opment of democracy. On one hand, democracy greatly expanded the possibilities of individual citizens to par- ticipate in government and the administration of com- mon aff airs. On the other hand, major offi ces should be designated to distinguished, appropriate individuals who excel over others, regardless of their origin. In the words of Pericles’ famous funeral speech: “Our constitu- tion is called a democracy because conduct of aff airs is entrusted not to a few but to the many...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.