Based on our own reading of Comenius’s work and our analysis of and compari- son between the author’s individual works, we align ourselves with the periodisa- tion proposed by the Czech philosopher and Comenius scholar Jan Patočka, who divides Comenius’s life into three qualitatively dissimilar periods: prepansophic (also called preparatory), pansophic and panorthotic (characterised by Come- nius’s reformation efforts). Comenius’s works written in the pre-pansophic (preparatory) period, and for that matter, the pansophic period do not contain much in the way of a fixed and comprehensive anthropological conception. Such a conception can be found only in the panorthotic work, namely in Comenius’s masterpiece, De rerum hu- manarum emendatione consultatio catholica. Works from the pre-pansophic period are based on the view of man as the image of God and the pinnacle of creation, whose nobility is, nevertheless, of a lower order than that of angels. Perhaps the most characteristic feature of these works is their striking anthropological pessimism. Man’s knowledge does not serve to broaden his horizons, enhance his will or inspire his activity; on the contrary, it leads him to an understanding that his existence is futile. The works uniformly stress the importance of reason as the defining feature of man’s nature; the will – if mentioned at all – is pushed into the background. This is evident, for example, from the short treatise Listové do nebe (Letters to Heaven), in which Comenius maintains that man’s destiny is entirely contingent on God’s will (as opposed to man’s own self-creative actions). Man...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.