From Heraclitus to the Sophists
Parmenides’ work was a major breakthrough that consisted in separating a single, integral, and eternal existence from the area of appearance where we encounter multiplicity and change. This separation naturally evoked controversy and the pursuit of harmony between them. One of the first significant reactions came from the scholar, Empedocles (492 – 432), in whose personality meets the reputation of a major poet, magician (“thaumaturge”), physician, politician, and soothsayer. He came from Acragas (Argigentum), a Greek colony in Sicily, supposedly from a wealthy family, and he could afford to pay a dowry to the Acragas’ maidens. He is also attributed as having performed miracles, exceptional healing deeds, and pro-democratic political activity. Perhaps most interesting is that in the surviving fragments, he declares himself a god who has committed a sin and ← 47 | 48 → fallen from a blissful state to a cycle of reincarnation to be purified. This aspect of his work obviously became the target of legends and anecdotes, especially concerning the mysterious circumstances of his death.
For our purposes, it is interesting that Empedocles’ fragments point to a Pythagorean influence. In addition, Empedocles draws from Parmenides and responds to Ionian thinking. This tradition attributed two writings, On Nature, and, Purifications, to Empedocles. The treatise, On Nature, is usually characterised as cosmological and cosmogonic writing, which also deals with the ontological and epistemological consequences of Parmenides’ thought. In contrast, Purifications, should have been more focused on issues of ethics, morals, and religious life. Therefore, based on this...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.