Plato and Aristotle
6. Soul and City
Plato’s understanding of the soul is not clearly given, and depending on dialogues we can find diverse and often contradictory claims. It concerns the core of Plato’s thought, which links the problems of metaphysics and ontology with the problems of knowledge and ethics. Similarly, as with other important issues, in problems of the soul it is also based on analogies and myths. Nevertheless, we face a number of moments that stand (more or less) in general. Even with a problem of recollection we meet that, according to Plato, the soul is eternal, it does not arise and it does not expire. The Pythagorean influence is also seen in the idea of the cycle of reincarnation of the soul, as he outlines it in the myth about the charioteers in Phaedra. The soul is different from the body because of its immortality, which follows the Orphics presented as “a grave of the soul” (Crat. 400c), as a prison, which ← 59 | 60 → harasses us by its needs and so prevents us “in pursuit of being” (Phaedo. 66c). The contradiction between body and soul would encourage us to come to the conclusion, that concerning knowledge, we must turn away from the body by severe austerities. According to Plato, instead of a radically ascetic life it is sufficient if one leads a life of moderation and does not give his body more than it needs.
Plato also deals with the soul in the Republic, where he develops the famous analogy between the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.