7. Hermeneutics of Romanticism
The changeover from the Enlightenment to Romanticism is characterised by a great discontinuity. We can say that the 19th century is separated from the Enlightenment by a rupture. The half-century, which divides Meier from Schleichmacher, looks, for philosophical hermeneutics, like a precipice. It is a case of a turning point, which was caused by the works of Immanuel Kant. What happened then? Rationalism, which was supported by Dannhauer, Spinoza, Chladenius, or Meier, collapsed. Kant’s critique of reason paradoxically led to the conquest of reason. A world order, which was seen as a priori in the light of reason itself, was ascribed with validity for only the world of phenomena. The world itself started to disappear into unknowability. The split of the phenomenal side of something and the thing itself is the basic source of Romanticism. Each approach ← 39 | 40 → to the world functions here as a subjective interpretation which necessarily has to begin with a subject, with its inherent a priori. A non-problematic approach to the world, which took into account metaphysical causality, suddenly collapsed. Understandably, many authors suffering from the loss of their world reacted with an attempt to go beyond the collapse towards the world of the past, where harmony, universality and unity of the phenomenal and the metaphysical reigned. This reawakened romanticising fascination of the Greek world came from this transfer which can be seen in the works of Goethe, Schiller, Wickelmann, the Schlegel brothers, Novalis, Herder, and von Humboldt. A romantic attempt to bring...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.