Pictures, Parables, Paradoxes
Edited By András Benedek and Kristóf Nyíri
Metaphor and Parable
In recent years, several scholars have attempted to reinterpret the nature of traditional literary figures, such as parable, allegory, and symbol. It was especially tempting to compare and contrast conceptual metaphors with parable and allegory.1 The reason for this possibly is that in both of these latter figures we can find, or at least assume the presence of, two domains that are systematically related to each other. In a way, we can see in them the functioning of a source and target domain and a set of systematic mappings between them. Scholars used the framework of conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) to deal with such other figures, suggesting similarities and differences between conceptual metaphors and parables, as well as other figures.
In the present paper, I will perform the same exercise. I take some of the fundamental tenets of CMT and see how closely they apply to some typical examples of parables. The fundamental ideas of CMT that I examine in relation to parables include: the nature of the source and target domain (section 2), the systematic mappings between the source and target (section 3), the issue of the origin of the mappings (from source or from target? – section 4), the cognitive function of conceptual metaphor (section 5), the kind of conceptual structure involved in the mappings (section 6), the basis, or grounding, of the mapping (section 7), the provenance of the source domains (section 8), the metaphorical homogeneity of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.