Understanding MPs’ Self-Imposed Cutbacks
7 Reforming Parliamentary Pensions. Evidence from Australia: Aligning MPs and Government Employees
Members of the House of Representatives in Australia were covered by a special unfunded defined benefit parliamentary pension scheme since its introduction in 1948, the Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Scheme (PCSS). More than a decade after the occupational superannuation plan was introduced for ordinary employees in 1992, an accumulated pension scheme was also implemented for MPs. As a consequence, all newly elected representatives are now covered by a defined contribution scheme, the Parliamentary Superannuation Act (PSA), which has been fully funded, since 2004. Both pension schemes had the same key parameters because the main aim was to align MPs’ occupational pension scheme with that of ordinary employees. A fully funded pension plan, which offered more generous benefits than the parliamentary and public superannuation plan, was also introduced for civil servants in 2005. As a result, MPs adjusted their pension scheme to the civil servant superannuation plan, thus improving their financial position.
This section briefly outlines the Australian welfare state. Detailing the structure and the design of the public pension scheme will help explain the public pension reforms (7.3.1) and their chronological proximity to the parliamentary pension reforms (7.4.2). MPs’ financial support is also described, as it relates to the topic of MPs’ pension provisions.
7.1.1 Public Old-Age Pensions and the Australian Welfare State
Unlike social insurance states such as Germany and Austria, whose systems are designed to maintain one’s standard of living during retirement, the pension system of the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.