The 10th Anniversary FDSL Conference, Leipzig 2013
Edited By Gerhild Zybatow, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Claudia Hurtig, Olav Mueller-Reichau and Maria Yastrebova
Against the SLP-status of the Russian pere-superiority
← 146 | 147 →Kristina Gehring
Baltische Föderale Immanuel-Kant-Universität Kaliningrad
The following paper discusses a rather small subpart of the larger debate about prefixed verbs in Russian and the questions of how prefixes can be categorized and of which function they assume. The focus of this paper will be on the Russian prefix pere- (‘over’) in its superiority-reading. I will show that pere-superiority does not fit the generally assumed SLP-criteria and, therefore, it cannot be classified as an SLP (i.e. counter to the view presented in Romanova 2006: 257). In short, I will argue against the widely accepted assumption that prefixes like pere-superiority that carry a stable, adverbial- or measure-like meaning automatically have to belong to the pattern of SLPs. According to the LP-/SLP-distinction, the prefix in the given reading has not yet been discussed in the respective literature in detail.
Decompositional syntactic accounts of verbal prefixation propose that prefixes in Russian and other Slavic languages fall into at least two different groups called lexical (LP) and superlexical prefixes (SLP). In the following paper I will call this approach the Prefix-Split-Theory. Proponents of this account argue that the former occupy a VP-internal position in the syntactic tree, whereas the latter merge outside the VP-complex (see Ramchand 2004; Svenonius 2004; Romanova 2006; Tatevosov 2008).
The fact that prefixes in Slavic languages, and in Russian in particular, fall into at least two different groups is already mentioned by Isačenko (1962), who draws a...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.