What Is Contemporary Critique Of Biopolitics?
To begin with, a political-philosophical analysis of biopolitics in the twenty-first century as its departure point, suggests the difference between Foucault’s theory and contemporary investigations, particularly Agamben’s, Hardt’s and Negri’s reflections. This difference, mostly between such works as The Birth of Biopolitics and Society Must Be Defended, on the one hand, and The History of Sexuality vs. Homo Sacer, State of Exception, Means Without End, Empire and Multitude, on the other, leads to the rethinking of the political and, therefore, to the issue of political subjectivities. Moreover, Foucault’s genealogy of the present – as the path for conceptualizing the multiplicity of appearances of contemporary biopolitics – actually leads to the rethinking not only of politics, but also of ethics and law. In comparison with post-political theories, the project of genealogical critique presents perspectives and potentialities for the political practice beyond biopolitics. Doubtlessly, Foucault does not in any case endorse either moral or political ends, and yet his oeuvre outlines what a political philosophy, faithful to his thinking, would look like – and that it could not be reduced to microphysics of power.
Our thesis here, therefore, is twofold: the basis for comprehending contemporary phenomena of biopolitics lies precisely in Foucault’s theory of biopolitics as neoliberalism whereas the response to such a situation can also be found perhaps, in a rethinking of freedom as a new potentiality of democratic politics. This is to say that an analysis of the birth of biopolitics in history of liberalism aims not only at...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.