Style, Aesthetics, and Reception
10. Nineteenth-century Transcriptions of Masterworks: An Attempt at Typology
When J. M. Chomiński and T. D. Turło published their Katalog dzieł Fryderyka Chopina [Catalogue of Works by Fryderyk Chopin],278 the most extensive list of transcriptions of compositions by Chopin to-date which it contained enabled the assessment of this phenomenon’s extent in the history of the last two hundred years. Several years later, my doctoral students and I took up the toil of an analytical survey that was designed to point the way for systematic studies in this neglected complex of issues. It turned out that out of 230 original works by Chopin, as many as 201 had been transcribed,279 and that some compositions (such as the Funeral March from the Sonata in B flat Minor op. 35) were the object of several hundred different settings! It also became clear that no specific period of Chopin’s output was preferred: the early Warsaw compositions as well as those from the 1830s and 1840s were transcribed equally often.280 However, there did exist a historically variable preference in choosing specific compositions as subjects of transcriptions: some were more popular in the nineteenth century (for example, the Funeral March of op. 35, Nocturne in E-flat Major op. 9 no. 2, and the Waltz in E flat Major op. 18), with others taking over in the ← 141 | 142 →twentieth century (such as the Etude in E Major op. 10 no. 3, Polonaise in A Major op. 40 no. 1 or the Waltz in C sharp Minor op. 64 no. 2).281...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.