Transition and Transfer in Germany and South Korea
Edited By Eun-Jeung Lee and Hannes B. Mosler
Civil Society and Political Theory
This study analyzes the development of civil society in Western and Eastern Europe as well as in the Arab cultural region from a political theory perspective. The author’s chief contention is on the interrelationship of civil society and democracy, and that while the existence of civil society does not guarantee democracy, it is difficult for a new democracy to form in places where civil society has not matured at all.
The concept of civil society is neither self-explanatory nor self-evident. For many protest and activist groups and organizations, it is just what they are doing or would like to do: Protesting in the streets, taking part in public discussions, but not taking institutional responsibility. If parts of former protest movements come to power and have to make hard choices, the hard decisions which are frustrating for some of the former dreams, there is often the inclination to consider them as treacherous from the point of view of the movement.
Only since the 1960s have scholars begun to relate the civil society discourse with social movements, especially with protest groups left of center. Jürgen Habermas, one the foremost theoreticians of civil society, defined civil society in a negative way as the social sphere which is not the state, not the market, and of course also not the private life (Reese-Schäfer 2001: 91ff.; Habermas 1992: 443). So it is some kind of public activity with political or semi-political content. It is more or less...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.