Show Less
Restricted access

Civil Society on the Move

Transition and Transfer in Germany and South Korea


Edited By Eun-Jeung Lee and Hannes B. Mosler

Following the transformation of the Soviet-controlled Eastern European system, there has been a renewal of discourses on civil society. The collection of essays discusses this complicated and controversial concept and explores the possibility of new approaches for the study of Korean civil society and democracy. Combining interdisciplinary and transregional research, it contributes directly to the field of democracy after democratization and sheds light on concepts of civil society, developments of various civil society organizations and student movements in Germany, Korea, and Eastern Europe.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Ideological Conflict in Civil Society and Korean Democracy in Trouble




This analysis illuminates the ideological fragmentation process of South Korean civil society after democratization. While the division of civil society after democratization between conservatives and progressives was not an entirely new phenomenon, the study focuses on how the fragmentation changed in quality during the 2000s. The essay also identifies a contrast in political dynamics between the underdevelopment of political representation and the overpoliticization of an ideologically divided civil society.

During the past decades, the term ‘civil society’ had enormous normative significance in the literature about democracy and democratization. It often was understood as the school of civic virtues, as the agent of democratization, and as a functional prerequisite for democracy. At the same time, however, many historical observations and empirical studies have shown that the meaning of civil society in the democratization process and within democratic system is not self-evident, but much more complex and ambivalent than advocates of the normative idea of civil society believed in the early phase of democratic transition (Arato 1993; Croissant 2003; Croissant and Trinn 2009; Diamond 1994; Klinke, Renn, and Lehners 1997).

Among many issues concerning this theme, this article focuses on the ideological conflict within civil society after the transition from authoritarian to democratic regime, and its impact on a new democracy in South Korea. Democracy allowed freedom and participation in many post-authoritarian societies, but it also facilitated the politicization of diverse social forces ← 73 | 74 → with ideological ambitions based on political, regional, religious, or ethnic cleavages....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.