Poetry and the Kenotic Word
Edited By Malgorzata Grzegorzewska, Jean Ward and Mark Burrows
The Embodied “I”, the Suffering “I” in the Poetry of Gerard Manley Hopkins
Gerard Manley Hopkins’s insightful understanding of the dogma of the Incarnation informs the very form and texture of his poetic works. This can be seen, for instance, in his daring experiments with sprung rhythm, his sophisticated word-play, his ingenious adoption of the Welsh cynghanedd and the countless neologisms which he coined for the needs of his poems. His journals and letters to his friends also reveal both a great interest in the “substance” of language and a fascination with the material world, as well as a genuine amazement in nature. In this article I shall attempt to read Hopkins’s focus on the Word made flesh from the perspective of contemporary post-phenomenology, with particular emphasis on the work of Michel Henry and his interpretation of the enfleshment of the divine Logos. I shall also be interested in the ways human suffering can be expressed in language, as the poetry of G. M. Hopkins affords a rare example of the putting into words of seemingly inexpressible and incommunicable experience: the experience of the embodied subject, afflicted by pain, anguish and loneliness.
Striving to abolish Cartesian dualism, post-phenomenologists stress the superior role of the flesh in talking about the human subject. The flesh, Jean-Luc Marion contends, is “that which gives me to myself” (99). As the title of Henry’s book L’amour les yeux fermes indicates, post-phenomenologists start by turning away from the external world and postulate a return to reflection on the human body and the flesh in order...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.