Show Less
Restricted access

Family and Kinship in the United States

Cultural Perspectives on Familial Belonging

Edited By Karolina Golimowska, Reinhard Isensee and David Rose

The volume takes a close look at the forms and functions of family and kinship in cultural narratives in the United States. It analyzes social and cultural contexts of kinship and family membership, relations of family and nation on a metaphorical level, and the political discourses that regulate sexuality and reproduction. Representations of family and kinship inform all aspects of American life, which is prominently noticeable in politics, legislation, art, and the media. Family discourses are employed to communicate and negotiate constellations of power and they can serve to investigate differences, struggles, alliances, strategic endeavors, and innovative conceptualizations of kinship. The essays collected in this volume provide readings of texts across various genres that highlight the role of cultural production in reconfiguring paradigms of family and kinship in the US.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

The Monster under the Bed: “Making” Boys in Picturebooks with Monsters


One of the most frequent themes in picturebooks with monsters is fear.1 While this observation is hardly surprising – monsters and fear are an associative pair, aren’t they? – it does in fact merit further attention. After all, children and monsters are usually allies, friends and intimates. This bond which reaches far beyond the realm of picturebooks is what distinguishes monsters in children’s culture from monsters in adults’ culture. Thus, picturebook stories about child characters who are afraid of monsters are not as self-evident as they might seem. And yet, they populate the bookshelves in libraries, book stores, and nurseries. A sceptic might immediately point to the invariably good ending of such “horror” stories for children. And is it not the case that monsters in picturebooks are always friendly and harmless? A sceptic might even go as far as to agree with German studies scholar and monsterologist Rolf Parr who claims that monsters in children’s fiction are not really figurations of monstrosity at all, but only temporary misrecognitions of actual “non-monsters” (Parr 26). If not right from the beginning, monsters’ fundamental benignity reveals itself no later than at the turning point of the story. Does it not? Contemplating the sixteen titles of my research corpus with the theme of fear, I suggest a more complex answer than “yes.”

One way to approach this question is to focus on the power inequality between children and adults, and to argue, as does Jackie Stallcup, that picturebooks about fear have an...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.