Show Less
Restricted access

Lost and Found in «Translation»

Circulating Ideas of Policy and Legal Decisions Processes in Korea and Germany


Edited By Eun-Jeung Lee and Hannes B. Mosler

This book analyzes policy translation and its ends, how the concept of translation explains the emergence and (ex-)changes of policy ideas in different places and/or across borders in general, as well as the effectiveness of this concept in analyzing cases of actual policy dissemination. This book discusses these questions on a general theoretical level and within the context of actual policies and laws mainly between South Korea and Germany. South Korea is widely considered a typical example of a reforming country that is on the receiving end of disseminations of policies and ideas from advanced countries. From this point of view, it constitutes a highly interesting case for testing the applicability of the translation approach. The basic idea of this book is to analyze how different actors in different contexts and settings adopt varying interpretations and understandings of an idea, and how well the analytical concept of translation can be utilized for this endeavor.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

(3) The Making of the Welfare State in Korea: Policy Discourses and Strategies


Abstract This chapter deals with the competing discourses and strategies that have influenced the development of welfare systems and the expansion of welfare expenditure in South Korea. The author evaluates the institutional consequences of welfare reform in Korea and analyzes the underlying nature of welfare state transformation in relation to Western experiences.

1. Introduction

The welfare state in Korea has developed since the 1960s from limited welfare programs toward more comprehensive welfare systems. This process has resulted in the welfare state in Korea having rather unique characteristics, many of which it has in common only with other East Asian countries. Numerous scholars have argued that an important feature of the evolution of social policy in East Asia has been “welfare developmentalism,” which views social policy as an instrument for economic development (Goodman and White 1998; Holliday 2000; Kwon 2007). While history has seen a rapid increase in state-provided social expenditure in East Asian countries, the welfare systems of these countries were, paradoxically, established by conservative governments with anti-welfare ideologies (Aspalter 2002). The Korean case is no exception, with social policy being regarded primarily as a highly effective policy instrument for stimulating economic growth during the country’s rapid process of industrialization.

Ever since the financial crisis of 1997–1998, unemployment and poverty have emerged as important social and political issues in Korea. Accordingly, the welfare system has rapidly developed and social spending has dramatically increased since the late 1990s. Owing to the fact...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.