Interdisciplinary Contributions to Contemporary Cultural Debates
Edited By Gail K. Hart and Anke S. Biendarra
Aimé Césaire: Europe, the Caribbean, or Africa?
What are the limits of Europe? Is there an integral Europe, a true “inside” intellectual space, or is this “inside” always penetrated by what lies beyond its geographical borders? Might it be possible to conceive of a Transnational, Transcontinental, or even Postcolonial European Studies? What would be the consequences for teaching Europe (or any of its languages and cultural traditions) if we were to re-think Europe through the postcolonial, or through the notions of the transnational and transversal? Could we imagine a New European Studies—a contemporary model of research for today’s academy—based precisely on these questions?
I like to think of European Studies, as an inter- or trans-discipline, a research field that opens up the possibility of juxtaposing various theoretical paradigms and historiographies, including formalist traditions of literary scholarship and materialistic approaches to cultural production. In the work presented below, I attempt to preserve the analytical tools for close reading that have been sharpened over the course of a century in the continental European language traditions while at the same time locating the literary text in its sociohistorical context. Ultimately, my goal is to generate what might be called a Materialist Formalism (or a Formalist Materialism, depending upon your emphasis) appropriate to a European Studies lit from within by Frankfurt School theory, cultural studies, and recent work on the colonial and postcolonial condition. My contention is that much work on the Black Atlantic has been occupied (and rightfully so) with...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.